EmersonKent.com - History for the Relaxed Historian











Financial Innovation

Go here for more about  Paul Keating.

Go here for more about
 Paul Keating's Financial Innovation speech.


Photo above:
Paul Keating at Bankstown Hall, 1993 - Copyright the National Archives of Australia.

It follows the full text transcript of Paul Keating's Financial Innovation speech, delivered at the Second Asian Leadership Conference, Seoul, Korea - February 21, 2008.


Paul Keating - Speech Your host, Chosun Ilbo,

has asked me to concentrate my luncheon address on the subject of financial and labor market reform. Your host has asked me to draw upon my experience in introducing reforms to those markets in Australia during the period when I was Treasurer and Prime Minister.

With a new President and new Government coming to office in Korea, President-elect Lee Myung Back has, amongst other things, foreshadowed financial market reforms to raise Korea's global competitiveness.

In setting this subject for lunch, Chosun Ilbo has asked me to reflect upon similar changes made in Australia 25 years ago and more recently, 15 years ago to give today's luncheon guests some clue from a practitioner as to the importance of these reforms and how they might work in a Korean context.

Perhaps I should make the overarching and key point first and make it succinctly. It is this: any country has a right and can choose the economic pathway of economic nationalism and protectionism. But supporters of that policy have to know that such a pathway, while having some popular appeal, carries with it the choice of sub-optimal or lower rates of economic growth coupled with lower and slower rates of income growth.

Perhaps I could paraphrase it this way: open markets provide more opportunities, more growth and faster income growth. But they require greater challenges from the ensuing adjustments and the greater requirement on the political system to respond to the need for those adjustments.

Open markets also do something else: by allowing competitive pricing, they make clear which parts of the economy are true profit centers and which, by contrast, are the parts which perform sub-optimally.

These outcomes inform investment choices such that capital is drawn to those parts of the economy where enhanced profitability lifts returns and with these returns, GDP growth. In other words, open markets identify the more likely and natural parts of the economy where scarce capital is best employed.

What impediments to trade, such as tariffs and quotas, financial regulation and labor market rigidities do, is to falsely pump up particular sectors and industries within the economy, making them appear more attractive and profitable than they really are. Whereas, those nominal attractions can only exist at the expense of the broader community by way of diminished incomes and lower GDP growth.

Like I say, we all have a choice but why, if we have the option and the power would we take the low income road over the high income one, simply to satisfy entrenched interest groups and to keep the political system free from trouble?

There is no revelation about this but the fact that these truths are so often ignored makes their recital worthwhile.

Politicians and political parties exist for one purpose and one purpose only: to safeguard the people while making the required and continuing changes to the fabric of their economies and their societies.

Politicians who are in the business of politics but not in the business of change let their communities down badly. The political game is about, and only about, getting the changes through. Bureaucracies are more than capable of running an existing system, but bureaucrats are not capable of changing it.

The great curse of modern day political life is incrementalism. Moving change along, millimeter by millimeter, taking few political risks while pretending to be the elector's friend.

Mandates for paradigm shifts in an economy or society belong only to politicians and to the political system; they can never belong to bureaucracies. Bureaucracies have no political power on which to draw; what they do, sometimes well and sometimes clumsily, is to filch morsels of power which they use to incrementally move along their own agendas.

It is no accident, that in countries where bureaucracies have been in the ascendancy, we find generally slower rates of economic growth and slower rates of income growth.

Decisive cabinet government aided and abetted by a competent bureaucracy is the highway to change.

With that in mind and with a new government about to take office in South Korea, your hosts have asked me to say something about the financial system and financial market reform.

When I first began opening the financial markets in Australia in 1983 I used to talk about a sclerosis which inhabited the Australian financial system. And I used to apply the analogy of saying we needed to clear the financial arteries to get blood to the muscle of the economy . That remark is as true today of unreformed financial systems as it was then. Open and porous financial markets can bring financial resources to parts of the economy that were undreamt of even 30 years ago. Financial deregulation allows financial engineering and packaging of a kind which the old regulated and traditional financial system was unable to provide. And, more importantly, unwilling to try.

Most financial systems built around deposit taking institutions were characterized as high margin businesses, offering a relatively limited range of services. Institutions of this kind serve a society particularly badly by making people pay too high a margin for financial resources while limiting the size of the group who qualify to enjoy those resources. Low margin, big volume, fungible financial services are able to help the great body of the community into assets and services they require. In doing so, they promote higher GDP growth.

The absence of unnecessary financial regulation, also underwrites the more rapid development of capital markets; those places where financial resources are available to industry and commerce other than through the intermediation of traditional banks. For instance, Japan is the model of a tops down bank intermediated financial economy where, on the other hand the United States has been the model of a much more horizontal financial structure where corporations and individuals have access to capital through a vibrant capital market. Where banks do what banks should do: look after the consumer, the householder and the small business entrepreneur.

Let's say of its essence; financial regulation represents a set of structures most valuable to the already wealthy while deregulation, openness and fungibility present avenues which are most valuable to the clever and the imaginative. When a society leaves the door shut to the clever and the imaginative while leaving it remain open to those of established wealth, that society is heading for second best outcomes.

That said, financial innovation also carries with it ongoing adjustment problems and distortions as we have seen in the United States more latterly.

A sustained period of economic expansion like the one we have experienced since 1982 will generate an ever growing role for the financial economy in world economic affairs. A 25 year expansion characterized by low inflation and with less circumscribed financial markets will inevitably underwrite an expanding role for financial services in our economic life. Indeed, we have seen a proliferation of institutions and services of a kind never before witnessed. And this period, at least for half of it, has also been characterized by accommodating monetary conditions and high levels of liquidity induced, in the main, by central banks.

The outcome has been a pot au feu ; a financial milieu without precedence in financial history. Financial innovation in this period has lead to all sorts of financial engineering and packaging to get financial resources into every crack and crevice of the economy, while on the asset side, ownership of those resources has been spread to the four corners of the earth under every instrument imaginable. Each new instrument brings another new name: collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, derivatives, hedges, swaps, securitized bonds and all manner of financial units, be they in listed trusts or private portfolios.

The fact is, for the first time in modern history we now have a financial system whose affairs and influences, are beyond the reach and remedy of central banks.

However true this is, would we have turned our back on the financial innovation which has lubricated the last 25 year expansion; or would we have opted for the safe house of bank intermediated economies run in clubby cabals by central banks, commercial banks and finance ministries?

The answer has to be, that of course, we should have preferred innovation over regulation, notwithstanding the problems that too often accompany innovation. The current sub-prime crisis in the United States teaches us again, that no amount of financial slicing and dicing can turn a bad credit into a good credit.

If sub-prime loans were bad to begin with they remained bad even as they were sliced and diced into a collateralized security held by unsuspecting investors. And let me add, that none of these tendencies have been helped by central banks who feel it is their bounden duty to underwrite the financial adventurism of investment banks and PE funds, by putting onto the state the contingent cost of financial miscalculation.

I do not think it is too much to claim that as a consequence of the behavior of central banks and their opportunistic clients, that moral hazard has become the leitmotif of financial services.

This has to be a worry for all governments and all prudential supervisors. But it is a worry that we have to work our way through, so that we can enjoy the advantageous aspects of financial innovation while seeking to limit the fallout to investors and the state alike.

North Asia, especially China and South Korea have an enormous stake in getting the design of their financial systems right. With economies growing in the order of 8 to 11 percent in a year, the ongoing resourcing of these economies will not be possible unless their financial systems move in tandem or are allowed to move in tandem, with economic expansion.

And what is true of financial markets is just as true as of labor markets.

Policy toward labor markets should be such as to encourage labor to go to the most productive places in the economy; to secure the greatest increments to income. Productivity based wage adjustments therefore represent the best way of lifting incomes while holding down inflation. And this is best accomplished by labor market mobility with workers being free to switch their time to the best jobs.

Social democratic states, very properly have another objective: and that is to guarantee that working people are able to enjoy a living wage, one that lifts them and their families above the poverty line. This can take the form of a legislated minimum or a basic award but in whatever form, it provides the foundation of a civil society. We should always remember that the point of economic policy is economic wealth and social progress. It should never be about top end wealth provided off the back of an army of working poor, denied the kind of wages and conditions that are conducive to the sustenance of families.

We ought remember that in that great cauldron of opportunity, the United States, real wages have not risen since the early 1980s. That is, the huge increments to productivity from the late 1990s on, have gone solely to profits and to those lucky individuals at the uppermost reaches of the corporate and financial system. This represents a massive indictment of the United States as the country of the fair society. This is not a model which will suit rising societies particularly of the Asian variety, which rely upon the family unit, family cohesion and family income as their nation's basic building block.

What a country needs is wage justice with full employment. Had by directing national financial resources to the appropriate and best parts of the economy, unfettered by the distortions of protectionism. Investment of the kind which, through productivity, is able to lift wages and profits simultaneously. Any fool can run a low wage economy in the quest for low prices and competitiveness, what we need are clever people to run systems which are productivity inducing; where real wages rise with GDP and where competitiveness is not had unfairly from the sweat of the low paid.

There will always be groups in the labor market whose positions are so weak that they are unable to bargain their way into high wages, to garner a share of the productivity. This is invariably true for women and young people and the broadly unskilled. Policy has to work at protecting these vulnerable people from exploitation while the better off are able to reasonably enjoy their economic rewards.

There is a real challenge here: we want flexible and mobile labor markets with earnings related to productivity but decency demands that we should have this only in the context of safety nets for the disadvantaged.

Education of course, provides the great spring board of opportunity including, into higher incomes. This is why an economy becoming more urbanized, with greater service orientation has to have a premium on education. Education is the conduit through which higher levels of productivity are had.

Education has been a notable and strong trend in Korea; it knows the way forward in the post industrial age. A country like Korea must continue to lift itself up the international division of labor and not be left behind to compete with low wage countries.

There is nothing more noble than lifting the great body of a population into higher levels of employment and income; indeed, there can be nothing more uplifting for a political system than lifting up the great body of a community. But this can only be done by governments competent in the ways of the world: knowing about the economy, knowing about business, knowing about the financial system, knowing about the workforce. Guiding policies with a kind and thoughtful hand.

Financial, product and labor market deregulation has brought much wealth to countries which have promoted these policies. Australia, as a case in point, has now experienced a continuous 17 year expansion averaging near 4% GDP growth per annum with inflation at 2.5%. In the 25 years since 1983, real incomes in Australia have risen by one third, over 30%. The largest increment to incomes at any time in the twentieth century. These policies will work just as well for Korea as they have worked for Australia.

Given that all societies are different, the variations on the theme in Korea will of course have to be Korean. But the underlying efficiency of the changes is guaranteed to lift people more rapidly up the income scale and to lift Korean GDP more obviously up the international totem pole.

It is a very encouraging development indeed, that one of this country's premier newspapers, Chosun Ilbo, is committed to these kind of outcomes and is prepared to meet the organizational responsibility of promoting a conference of this kind in promotion of those outcomes.

Let me congratulate the newspaper, its management and staff, on this important initiative.



More History

Previous Page

John Brown's Final Speech


Back to

First Page

Back to
Main Page


Next Page

Finest Hour



Browse the Speech Archive
All speeches are organized by topic, by speaker, in chronological order, and by group.

Speeches by Topic A-Z

Speeches by Topic: A

Speeches by Topic: B - D

Speeches by Topic: E - G

Speeches by Topic: H - I

Speeches by Topic: J - O

Speeches by Topic: P - S

Speeches by Topic: Ta - The J

Speeches by Topic: The K - Tz

Speeches by Topic: U - Z

Speeches by Speaker A-Z

Speeches by Speaker: A - C

Speeches by Speaker: D - G

Speeches by Speaker: H - L

Speeches by Speaker: M - R

Speeches by Speaker: S - Z

Speeches in Chronological Order

Speeches by Date: Ancient Times-1800

Speeches by Date: 1801-1850

Speeches by Date: 1851-1900

Speeches by Date: 1901-1920

Speeches by Date: 1921-1940

Speeches by Date: 1941-1950

Speeches by Date: 1951-1960

Speeches by Date: 1961-1965

Speeches by Date: 1966-1970

Speeches by Date: 1971-1980

Speeches by Date: 1981-1990

Speeches by Date: 1991-Today

Speeches by Group

Speeches Given by Women

Speeches Given by African-Americans

Speeches Given by U.S. Presidents


Frequently Viewed Speeches

Socrates: Apology - 399 BC
Socrates: Apology
399 BC

Abraham Lincoln: Gettysburg Address - 1863
Abraham Lincoln: Gettysburg Address

Winston Churchill: Their Finest Hour - 1940
Winston Churchill: Their Finest Hour

Martin Luther King Jr.: I Have a Dream - 1963
Martin Luther King Jr.: I Have a Dream


Picture Archive

Find pictures and photos of historic people and events.

Picture Archive A - C

Picture Archive D - M

Picture Archive N - Z

Attila the Hun

Attila King of the Huns

The greatest of all Barbarian rulers, Attila kicked rear on a large scale.

Attila short biography

Map of Attila's empire

Battle of the Catalaunian Plains

Who were the Huns?

Greco-Persian Wars

Also called the Persian Wars, the Greco-Persian Wars were fought for almost half a century from 492 BC - 449 BC. Greece won against enormous odds. Here is more:

Battle of Marathon
Battle of Thermopylae
Battle of Salamis
Battle of Plataea


EK Books

Knowledge that sticks. Print or download. Global shipping. 



Music in History

Music that played a role in history.

Learn More



Mexican Revolution

The Mexican Revolution

Check out the
Timelines of the Mexican Revolution

Mexico's transition from dictatorship to constitutional republic translated into ten messy years of skirmishing in Mexican history.

More from the Mexican Revolution:

Pancho Villa

Emiliano Zapata

Francisco I. Madero

Causes of the Mexican Revolution

Women in the Mexican Revolution

Summary of the Mexican Revolution





French Revolution - Its Causes, Its Victims, Its Effects


People in History

Historic People - Main

People in History A - C

People in History D - F

People in History G - I

People in History J - M

People in History N - Q

People in History R - Z

Royal Families

Tribes & Peoples

Explorers, Scientists & Inventors

Musicians, Painters & Artists

Poets, Writers & Philosophers

First Ladies

Native Americans & The Wild West





Wars, Battles & Revolutions

Wars & Revolutions A

Wars & Revolutions B - E

Wars & Revolutions F - G

Wars & Revolutions H - J

Wars & Revolutions K - O

Wars & Revolutions P - R

Wars & Revolutions S - Z

Wars & Revolutions Chronological

Battles A - C

Battles D - L

Battles M - P

Battles Q - Z

Battles Ancient Times - 1499

Battles 1500 - 1799

Battles 1800 - Today



History Dictionary A - F

History Dictionary G - Z

Source Text - By Title

Source Text - By Author

Historic Documents A - Z

Historic Documents Chronological

History News




Kids & History


About Us

Write Me



Sitemap 01   Sitemap 02   Sitemap 03    Sitemap 04   Sitemap 05   Sitemap 06  
Sitemap 07   Sitemap 08   Sitemap 09    Sitemap 10   Sitemap 11   Sitemap 12
Sitemap 13   Sitemap 14   Sitemap 15    Sitemap 16   Sitemap 17   Sitemap 18
Sitemap 19   Sitemap 20   Sitemap 21    Sitemap 22   Sitemap 23

Site Search






© 2016 Emerson Kent