OTTO VON BISMARCK - CREATOR OF THE
Blood and Iron
Go here for more about
Otto von Bismarck.
Go here for more about
Bismarck's Blood and Iron speech.
It follows an excerpt transcript of
Otto von Bismarck's Blood and Iron speech, delivered at
Berlin, Germany - September 30, 1862.
Go here for the
German version of this speech.
to Max von Forckenbeck's lengthy arguments about
appropriation rights and Art. 99 of the
constitution and the people's wish for a
shortened military service:
He would like to
go into the budget for 1862, though without
making a prejudicial statement. An abuse of
constitutional rights could be undertaken by any
side; this would then lead to a reaction from
the other side.
The Crown for
example could dissolve parliament twelve times
in a row, that would certainly be permitted
according to the letter of the constitution, but
it would be an abuse.
It could just as
easily reject cuts in the budget, immoderately.
It would be hard to tell where to draw the line
there. Would it be at 6 million? At 16? Or at
There are members
of the National Association [Nationalverein] of
this association that has achieved a reputation
owing to the justness of its demands, highly
esteemed members who have stated that all
standing armies are superfluous. Well, what if a
public assembly had this view! Would not a
government have to reject this?
There was talk
about the sobriety of the Prussian people. Yes,
the great independence of the individual makes
it difficult in Prussia to govern with the
constitution or to consolidate the constitution.
In France things
are different, there this individual
independence is lacking. A constitutional crisis
would not be disgraceful, but honorable instead.
are perhaps too well-educated to support a
constitution. We are too critical. The ability
to assess government measures and records of the
public assembly is too common. In the country
there are a lot of catiline [conspiratorial]
characters who have a great interest in
upheavals. This may sound paradoxical, but
everything proves how hard constitutional life
is in Prussia.
is too sensitive about the government's
mistakes, as if it were enough to say this and
that cabinet minister made mistakes, as if one
wasn't adversely affected oneself. Public
opinion changes, the press is not the same as
public opinion. One knows how the press is
parliament have a higher duty, to lead opinion,
to stand above it. We are too hot-blooded. We
have a preference for putting on armor that is
too big for ou